That sounds the research experience of an high school students almost. Graecae, Brepols Latin Texts, L’Année Philologique), artifact examination and photographing at theīritish Museum, papyrus and manuscript analysis, and personal consultation with relevant experts." "Extensive library use at universities and seminaries, digital databases (esp.
His "research experience" (haha) is (again from his CV: to 313 A.D.)" (from his CV).įrankly someone who has an M.Phil on philsophy specializing on Greece and Rome and not knowing anything about Platonism and Aristotelianism (as he shows) sounds to me either he committed fraud or that the faculty at Columbia are total idiots. He has a PHD in ancient history so at least was someone to take seriously when it comes to the historical aspect of the NT.įirst he majored in Greco-Roman Philosophy and religion and his PhD was on "Attitudes Toward the Natural Philosopher in theĮarly Roman Empire (100 B.C. Literally what “logically necessary” means. If some entity’s existence is logically necessary, by definition its absence The absence of everything but logical contradictions is the same thing as the presence of only the logically necessary. Presence of every logically necessary thing. And by Feser’s own reasoning, the absence ofĮverything except logically contradictory states of affairs entails the Objects, minds, or extensions of space or time. Logically contradictory states of affairs. You can have without facing a logical contradiction, is the absence of everything except
Paragraph from the beginning of Carrier’s discussion of the Aristotelian proof: Usually bear at least a crude resemblance to the argument under consideration. Say that Carrier attacks straw men would be an insult to straw men, which In an article at his blog, pop atheist writer Richard Carrier grandlyĬlaims to have “debunked!” (exclamation point in the original) Five Proofs of the Existence of God.
0 kommentar(er)
